This page is the catalogue: what sentence patterns we know, which have rules, and which still need evidence. It is separate from the live corpus progress on the dashboard.
Coverage is currently measuring; no completed census is being claimed.
No source-diverse exact second witness survived current replay, so this intake contributes no semantic rule target. Exact root/family/child query; second text must come from a different source document. Intake generated · engine 857aa969.
458 raw reparses · 98 eligible roots · 0 replayed seeds. Intake · engine 857aa969. These are exact emitter counts, not a claim about coverage or rule value.
The remaining structures are classifier investigations. They become rule candidates only after a named semantic distinction and independent replay. Intake · engine 857aa969. Inspect the evidence queue →
construction signatures 976.4s · intake 735.6s · attachment drift audit 708.9s. Frozen queue · engine 857aa969.
| gate | have / need | state |
| chunks | 50 / 50 | met |
| discovery_bins | 0 / 8 | not met |
| forms | 44 / 30 | met |
| genres | 2 / 2 | met |
| rolling_origins | 0 / 5 | not met |
Registered inventory: 13 families · 69 forms · 0 observed in a sampled chunk (0 until sampling runs).
Taxonomy coverage (hand-curated statuses on registered forms — this half is NOT empty): observed 69 · specified 62 · implemented 49 · verified 45 · partial 11. The gates and estimates above/below are 0 because the statistical discovery layer (corpus sampling) has not run yet — eligible_message_cutoff=0, 0 chunks. Two separate things.
Each form's status is shown as independent facets (lit = holds). Absent facets are neutral, not failures.
One actor participates in two linked events, such as “Maya wants to leave.”
{"controller": "matrix_subject", "dependency": "xcomp", "voice": "active"}{"controller": "matrix_object", "dependency": "xcomp", "voice": "active"}{"controller": "raised_subject", "dependency": "xcomp", "voice": "active"}{"controller": "matrix_subject", "coordination": "parenthetical_outcome", "dependency": "xcomp", "relation": "purpose"}{"controller": "passive_subject", "coordination": "predicate", "dependency": "xcomp", "relation": "intended_function", "voice": "passive"}A complete proposition is the content of a belief, report, perception, or result.
{"dependency": "ccomp", "frame": "reporting", "voice": "active"}{"dependency": "ccomp", "frame": "reporting", "voice": "passive"}{"dependency": "ccomp", "frame": "epistemic", "voice": "active"}{"coordination": "clause_explicit_subject", "dependency": "ccomp", "semantic_frame": ["attitude", "reporting", "factive"]}{"clause_type": "embedded_question", "dependency": "ccomp"}{"dependency": "ccomp", "finiteness": "bare_infinitive", "semantic_frame": "perception", "subject": "explicit"}{"dependency": "ccomp", "finiteness": "gerund_participial", "semantic_frame": "perception", "subject": "explicit"}{"dependency": "ccomp", "modality": "explicit", "nested_frame": "causative_make", "result": "predicative_small_clause", "semantic_frame": "attitude"}{"complementizer": ["that", "zero"], "dependency": "ccomp", "matrix_subject": ["deictic", "nominal", "coordinated_nominal"], "parser_envelope": ["canonical", "coordinated_source_promoted_content_root", "stolen_final_of_object"], "polarity": "affirmative", "semantic_frame": "semantic_result"}A second event tells when, why, under what condition, or for what purpose the main event occurs.
{"dependency": "advcl", "relation": "temporal", "subject": "explicit"}{"dependency": "advcl", "marker": "because", "relation": "causal_because"}{"dependency": "advcl", "relation": "concessive", "subject": "explicit"}{"dependency": "advcl", "marker": "if_only_because", "nested": ["reporting_advcl", "quoted_comparison_advcl"], "relation": "causal_because"}{"dependency": "advcl", "finiteness": "infinitival", "relation": "purpose"}{"controller": "matrix_subject", "coordination": "disjunctive_labeled", "dependency": "advcl", "finiteness": "infinitival", "relation": "purpose"}{"dependency": "advcl", "frame": "reporting_as", "nested": ["temporal_when", "controlled_participial_elaboration"], "quotation": "direct"}A noun carries another event, but the system must determine who performs it and whether it is content, purpose, or a description before projecting it.
{"controller": "matrix_subject", "dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "infinitival", "matrix_frame": ["feel", "have"]}{"controller": "matrix_subject", "coordination": "predicate", "dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "infinitival"}{"controller_number": "common_number", "controller_source": "agent_oblique_object", "matrix_voice": "passive", "nested_content": ["without_participle", "attempted_passive", "purpose_make_certain"], "participial_coordination": ["advcl", "final_conj"]}{"container": "possessed_role_noun", "controller": "possessor", "coordination": "predicate", "dependency": ["acl", "relcl"], "finiteness": "infinitival"}{"container": "appositive_way", "controller": "matrix_experiencer", "coordination": "predicate", "dependency": "relcl", "finiteness": "infinitival"}{"controller": "matrix_indirect_object", "dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "infinitival", "matrix_frame": "granting"}{"controller": "unknown", "dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "infinitival", "relation": "purpose"}{"dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "participial", "host": "existential", "scope": ["bare", "estimated_content"], "semantic_sense": "wordnet:leftover.s.01", "surface": "left"}{"agent": ["explicit", "unknown"], "dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "past_participle", "punctuation": "unbounded", "relation": "restriction", "voice": "passive"}{"dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "participial", "relation": "restriction", "voice": "active"}{"agent": ["explicit", "unknown"], "dependency": "acl", "finiteness": "past_participle", "punctuation": "comma_bounded", "relation": "elaboration", "voice": "passive"}A clause identifies or adds information about a person or thing.
{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "subject", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "subject", "restriction": "elaborating"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "passive_subject", "restriction": "elaborating", "voice": "passive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "locative", "marker": "where", "restriction": "elaborating"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "subject", "nesting": "non_predicative_coordination", "restriction": "elaborating"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "oblique", "marker": "preposition_plus_which", "modality": "optional", "semantic_role": "unresolved"}{"coordination": "none", "dependency": "relcl", "gap": "passive_subject", "modality": "optional", "restriction": "restrictive", "temporal_modifier": "optional", "voice": "passive"}{"coordination": "disjunctive_predicate", "dependency": "relcl", "gap": "passive_subject", "modality": "explicit", "polarity": "negative", "restriction": "restrictive", "voice": "passive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "nesting": "advcl_temporal_since", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"composition": "copular_same_head", "dependency": "relcl", "quantification": "generic_bare_plural", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "direct_object", "marker": "elided", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "direct_object", "marker": "overt_bound_relativizer", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "locative", "marker": "where", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "temporal", "marker": "when", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "reason", "marker": "why", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "direct_object", "marker": "elided", "predicate": "finite_proverb_ellipsis", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"dependency": "relcl", "gap": "oblique", "marker": "elided_or_stranded_preposition", "restriction": "restrictive"}{"composition": "temporal_before", "dependency": "relcl", "gap": "subject", "punctuation": "paired_dash", "restriction": "elaborating"}A second clause supplies the other side of a more-than, less-than, or rather-than comparison.
{"dependency": "advcl", "relation": "comparison", "subject": "explicit"}{"dependency": "advcl", "relation": "comparison", "subject": "shared"}One part describes an unknown or ranked thing, and the other says exactly what it was.
{"copula_parse": ["auxiliary_on_action", "copular_root_with_xcomp"], "head": "superlative_thing", "relative": "contact_object_gap", "value": "bare_predicate"}Two propositions or participants are joined by and, but, or, or a similar connective.
{"conjunct": "predicate", "dependency": "conj", "subject": "shared"}{"conjunct": "clause", "dependency": "conj", "subject": "explicit_each"}{"controller": "shared_patient", "dependency": "conj", "shared": "auxiliary", "voice": "passive"}{"dependency": "conj", "marker": "or", "projection": "source_anchored_operands"}A nearby noun phrase gives another name or description for the same thing.
{"dependency": "appos", "number": "singular", "relation": "identity"}{"dependency": "appos", "polarity": "negative", "relation": "non_identity"}The sentence foregrounds what was affected; the actor may appear in a by-phrase or remain unknown.
{"agent": "expressed_by_phrase", "voice": "passive"}{"agent": "unexpressed", "voice": "passive"}One proposition holds, may hold, or follows if another condition is met.
{"dependency": "advcl", "order": "antecedent_first", "relation": "conditional_if"}{"dependency": "advcl", "order": "consequent_first", "relation": "conditional_if"}{"dependency": "advcl", "order": "consequent_first", "relation": "conditional_unless"}Two full thoughts sit side by side; punctuation and context explain their relationship.
{"dependency": "parataxis", "punctuation": "colon", "relation": "elaboration"}{"dependency": "parataxis", "frame": "reporting", "order": "content_first"}An -ing or -ed phrase contributes another event and borrows its actor or affected thing from the main clause.
{"finiteness": "participial", "order": "subordinate_first", "relation": "temporal"}{"finiteness": "participial", "order": "matrix_first", "relation": "temporal"}{"finiteness": "participial", "order": "matrix_first", "relation": "causal_result"}| family | discoveries |
| xcomp | 0 |
| ccomp | 0 |
| advcl | 0 |
| acl | 0 |
| relcl | 0 |
| comparison | 0 |
| pseudocleft | 0 |
| coordination | 0 |
| apposition | 0 |
| passive | 0 |
| conditional | 0 |
| parataxis | 0 |
| participial-clause | 0 |
This is where the projected % done ± error bars lives (Chao2 projected-total as the denominator). It is WITHHELD — NOT 0%. The sampling run RAN (50 chunks, 5,000 sentences, 44 forms observed) — prospective status POPULATED. The projection is still WITHHELD, but NOT for lack of data: failed gate chao_interval_unidentifiable. With Q1=1 (forms seen once) and Q2=1, the Chao2 unseen-gap is mathematically unidentifiable — no valid 95% interval, so no honest ± bars.
The label when it lands: projected completion of the sampled/catalogued grammatical-form population — NOT "% of English". Absolute counts stay separate (shown above). Interval targets the Chao2 lower-bound estimator, not the true inventory.